Watching DB’s Closing Arguments. Key Takeaways.

  1. I still cannot believe this idiot wanted to argue jury nullification for HOMICIDE.

  2. The look on Zach Witchow’s face - the look of utter and complete disgust and contempt - pretty much says it all.

  3. I’m not a legal scholar, but I definitely think Judge Dorow let Brooks argue with her for WAY too long.I understand why, but it seems like she was trying to reason with a toddler.

  4. The fact that DB is arguing that the damage to SUV was caused by barricades, not bodies, when there is LITERALLY VIDEO OF HIM RUNNING PVER AND HITTING PEOPLE.

  5. When DB questioned whether or not DA Opper cared about the victims, I thought she was going to jump out of her seat.

  6. I really think that Brooks has oppositional defiance disorder. He does not like being told what to do.

  7. His closing argument is like his “defense” - a hodge-podge of meritless arguments, baseless claims, mischaracterization of evidence, and crocodile tears.

  8. “None of us are perfect.” Correct. But not committing vehicular homicide is a pretty low bar to clear.